AI Governance and Audit Readiness Platform

Your auditor is going to ask about AI. Be ready.

Collect evidence from your existing tools, assess framework readiness, and build a traceable governance record for internal and auditor-led review.

app.nitivai.com
Nitivai product walkthrough showing dashboard, triage, EU AI Act readiness, and collected evidence
NIVAI-AGFIn-house frameworkISO 42001Readiness availableSOC 2 Type IIDiscuss requirementsISO 27001Discuss requirementsNIST AI RMFDiscuss requirementsEU AI ActReadiness availableSA AI ActRoadmap
Headquartered in South AfricaServing organisations across Africa and EuropeStandard published at nivai.org

The challenge

Can you answer these questions today?

These are not hypothetical. They are what auditors, regulators, and enterprise customers are asking right now.

Data leakage

Your finance team is pasting customer data into AI right now. Do you know where that data goes — or whether it is training the model?

Data sovereignty

Your AI provider says data stays in your region. Under the CLOUD Act, a US-headquartered provider can be compelled to hand it over regardless.

Shadow AI

Your employees are signing up for AI tools on personal accounts. No SSO. No DPA. No visibility. You have no record it is happening.

Customer trust

Your enterprise customer is asking about AI governance. Right now, most teams answer with a PDF and hope nobody checks.

Audit readiness

Your auditor will ask which AI tools your employees use and where that data goes. Can you answer that today — with evidence?

Board reporting

Your board wants a structured AI risk report. You have policies. You do not have evidence they are being followed.

How it works

From evidence to independent review

Build a traceable evidence record, act on the gaps, and bring in independent review when needed.

01
Evidence

Collect your evidence

Nitivai is available through guided onboarding. Bring together signals from supported connectors, documents, registers, and manual submissions.

  • Supported tool connectors
  • Document evidence
  • Structured registers
  • Manual submissions
02
Readiness

Understand and close gaps

Review what is met, what is missing, and which actions will improve readiness against the framework you selected.

  • Requirement-level results
  • Prioritised remediation
  • Assigned owners
  • Progress reporting
03
Independent review

Work with an independent auditor

When external assurance is required, a qualified auditor can review the evidence and raise findings in a separate workspace.

  • Direct evidence review
  • Control-level findings
  • Recorded decisions
  • Traceable outcome

Independent audit

Independent auditors. Rigorous process.

Bring independent review into the same evidence workflow when external assurance is required. Engagements depend on agreed scope and qualified auditor availability.

Independent review

Auditors are external to Nitivai and independent from your organisation. They access your evidence pack directly -- no intermediary, no curated summaries, no selective disclosure.

Control-level review

You see the evidence presented for each requirement and the findings recorded by the auditor, without relying on unstructured email.

Verified practitioners

Practitioner qualifications, independence, relevant experience, and availability are confirmed before an engagement is assigned.

See the workflow

Explore Nitivai with your own requirements

A tailored demonstration can cover your evidence sources, framework views, remediation workflow, reports, and auditor collaboration.

What's included

Everything you need for AI governance

Multi-source evidence

Combine supported connectors, documents, registers, and manual submissions with clear provenance.

Requirement-level assessment

Each selected framework requirement shows exactly what was found and why.

Remediation guidance

Specific steps to fix each gap, ordered by impact on your score.

Board-ready reports

PDF reports for your board, your auditor, or your enterprise customers.

Framework readiness reporting

Review results against the requirements and evidence path of the selected framework.

Auditor portal

Qualified external auditors can review evidence through a separate workspace when an engagement is agreed.

ISO 42001
Readiness available

ISO 42001 readiness reporting is now live

ISO 42001 uses a dedicated clause-based readiness workflow. Evidence paths, reporting scope, and any auditor-led engagement are confirmed during guided onboarding for your organisation.

Clause-based readiness workflow
Dedicated readiness report
Connector and document evidence
Structured evidence pack
Gap analysis included
Remediation guidance per clause
ISO 42001 Readiness71%
9 clause gaps to close before audit100% = audit-ready
ISO 42001 Clauses42 clauses
4. ContextOrganisational contextPASS
5. LeadershipAccountability & policyPARTIAL
6. PlanningObjectives & riskPARTIAL
7. SupportResources & competencePASS
8. OperationOperational controlsGAP
9. PerformanceEvaluationPASS
10. ImprovementContinual improvementPARTIAL

The platform

Built for the teams responsible for AI governance

Give security, compliance, risk, AI owners, and auditors a shared view of evidence, readiness, and the work required to improve it.

Governance overview

See your AI governance posture at a glance

A single dashboard shows your readiness score, domain-by-domain breakdown, governance trends, and the controls that need attention.

Current readiness score
Domain breakdown
Trend tracking across assessments
Risk-prioritised control list
40%readiness
Nivaya TechnologiesBUILDING
Illustrative status types
Pass
Partial
Fail
Pending
Domain coveragetop gaps
AIENCEncryption
20%
AIRELReliability
20%
AIAUDAudit
14%
DSData sovereignty
13%
AISECSecurity
11%
AIDLPData lifecycle
10%
AIACCAccountability
0%
Triage & remediation

Fix what matters, in the right order

Every failing control comes with step-by-step remediation guidance: who should fix it, how long it takes, and exactly what changes when they do. Assign owners, track progress, close gaps.

Step-by-step fix instructions
Ownership assignment
Priority-ordered by score impact
Before-and-after expectations
Priority controlsBrowse all 116
ControlStatusSeverity
AIACC-007
SSO enforcement for AI tools
FAILCritical
DS-004
Cross-border data flow tracking
PARTIALModerate
AIPRV-005
Consent management for AI processing
FAILCritical
AIDLP-003
Data retention policy enforcement
PARTIALModerate
Remediation
AIACC-007: SSO enforcement
1Federate AI tools through your identity provider
2Enforce SSO for all AI tool access
3Disable local authentication on AI tools
Evidence engine

Bring evidence together from multiple sources

Connectors collect technical signals from supported tools. The rules-based document engine evaluates uploaded policies, while registers and manual submissions capture evidence that cannot be collected automatically.

Connector evidence
Rules-based document evaluation
Structured registers
Manual evidence submissions
Evidence sourcesConnector library
JumpCloud
Identity provider
14 findings
AWS
Cloud infrastructure
8 findings
GitHub
Source control
11 findings
Anthropic
AI provider
6 findings
Document analysis
AI-Acceptable-Use-Policy.pdf
Strong
Data-Retention-Policy.pdf
Adequate
AI-Risk-Register.xlsx
Weak
Data sovereignty

Know where your AI data goes

Map which AI tools run in which regions, flag tools operating outside your approved data processing regions, and track cross-border data flows. Region-level visibility your auditor will ask for.

Approved region management
Cross-border flow tracking
Tools-at-risk identification
Sovereignty score per tool
AI tools by region5 tools tracked
Anthropic (Claude)
USApproved
OpenAI (GPT-4)
USApproved
AWS Bedrock
EU (Frankfurt)Approved
Cohere
USAt risk
Together AI
USAt risk
Approved regions
3
US, EU, UK
At risk tools
2
Outside DPA scope
Governance properties

Evaluate AI tools by what matters, not by tier labels

NIVAI-AGF evaluates every AI session against four observable governance properties: training opt-out, bounded retention, identity attribution, and administrative visibility. A tool is governed when all four are demonstrable, regardless of its commercial label.

Training opt-out confirmed
Bounded data retention
Corporate identity attribution
Administrative visibility
Claude (Anthropic)Governed
Training opt-out
Bounded retention
Identity attribution
Admin visibility
ChatGPT (OpenAI)Ungoverned
Training opt-out
Bounded retention
Identity attribution
Admin visibility
Gemini (Google)Ungoverned
Training opt-out
Bounded retention
Identity attribution
Admin visibility

Integrations

Evidence connectors for the tools you already use.

Connect the tools your organisation already uses. Connectors collect technical signals where a supported integration is configured. Documents, registers, and manual submissions complete the evidence record.

Identity & Access
JumpCloud, Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, Auth0, OneLogin, Ping Identity
Source Control
GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps
AI Providers
Anthropic, OpenAI, AWS Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, Google AI, Cohere, Meta AI, Together AI
AI Code Assistants
GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Claude Code, Amazon Q, Gemini Code Assist, Aider
Cloud Infrastructure
AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, DigitalOcean, Railway, Render
Communication
Slack, Microsoft Teams, Zoom
Endpoint Security
CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Microsoft Defender, Bitdefender
Endpoint Management
Jamf Pro, Kandji, Microsoft Intune, Workspace ONE
HR & People
BambooHR, Workday, HiBob, Personio, Deel, Rippling
Monitoring
Datadog, Grafana, New Relic, Sentry, Splunk
Project & Docs
Jira, Linear, Asana, Confluence, Notion, Monday.com
Security & Compliance
Snyk, Wiz, Netskope, Microsoft Purview, HashiCorp Vault, KnowBe4

NIVAI-AGF Standard

116 controls across 18 domains

A comprehensive AI governance standard purpose-built for organisations that develop or use AI. Evidence can come from supported connectors, uploaded policies, structured registers, and manual submissions maintained inside Nitivai.

Data Sovereignty
AI Data Leakage Prevention
AI Privacy
AI Access Control
AI Security
AI Reliability
AI Model Lifecycle
AI Encryption
AI Documentation
AI Human Resources
AI Finance
AI Development
AI Operations
AI Governance
AI Risk
AI Audit
AI Sales
Agentic AI Governance

Full standard published at nivai.org →

Framework readiness

Framework-specific readiness in one workspace.

Choose the framework that fits your obligations, then review its requirements, evidence, gaps, and progress in one place. Available workflows are confirmed during onboarding. NIVAI-AGF is an in-house peer framework, not an accredited standard.

NIVAI-AGF

NIVAI-AGF

In-house AI governance framework

Readiness available
ISO 42001

ISO 42001

AI management system

Readiness available
SOC 2 Type II

SOC 2 Type II

AI controls subset

Discuss requirements
ISO 27001

ISO 27001

AI security controls

Discuss requirements
NIST AI RMF

NIST AI RMF

Risk management framework

Discuss requirements
EU AI Act

EU AI Act

Regulatory readiness

Readiness available
SA AI Act

SA AI Act

South African AI regulation

In roadmap

For auditors

Join the founding auditor network

We are establishing a founding cohort of independent practitioners for auditor-led AI governance engagements. We welcome auditors from all disciplines -- information security, compliance, risk, data protection, and technology audit.

Founding auditors are independent practitioners, not employees of Nitivai. You conduct external audits through the Nitivai Auditor Portal and bring your own professional judgement to every engagement. Assignment depends on agreed scope, independence, relevant qualifications, and availability.

Experience in audit, compliance, risk, or information security
Familiarity with AI governance, data protection, or technology standards
Holds a relevant qualification: CISA, CISSP, ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, ISO 42001 Lead Auditor, CIPM, CIA, or equivalent
Independent of organisations you audit

Engagement terms and availability are confirmed before an assignment is made.

Apply as a founding auditor

Dedicated auditor platform

The Nitivai Auditor Portal gives you direct access to evidence packs, structured control review, and a finding workflow. No shared login with the organisation being audited.

Structured evidence, not raw data

Evidence is pre-collected and organised by control. You review what the platform found, raise findings where evidence is missing or insufficient, and record your verdict per control.

Shape the process

Founding auditors provide feedback that shapes how AI governance audits work. Your input influences how the standard is applied in practice.

Request a demo

See Nitivai in action

We will walk you through a 30-minute demo of the platform, tailored to your frameworks of interest. No sales pitch. Just the product.

Live assessment walkthrough

See how evidence is collected from your tools and turned into control results.

ISO 42001 readiness report

See how a clause-based readiness report brings together evidence from the sources in scope.

Auditor portal demo

See what your external auditor will see when reviewing your evidence pack.

Frameworks of interest

AI governance you can prove.

Bring together technical signals, documents, registers, and manual evidence, then review your readiness against the framework in scope.

niti (Sanskrit) — moral order·vai (Portuguese) — it goes forward

Supports framework-specific assessment workflows, including the in-house NIVAI-AGF framework published at nivai.org.